Event Published Models and productsAnthropic
Anthropic Launches Claude Sonnet 5.5 With Same Token Prices
Anthropic released Claude Sonnet 5.5 on September 28, 2026, holding the API price of its predecessor steady while claiming faster answers and lower per-task cost for most work.
What happened
Published here
Anthropic launched Claude Sonnet 5.5 on September 28, 2026, the second model in its Sonnet 5.5 family after Opus 5.5, positioned as a faster, cheaper complement for everyday coding, document work and design tasks, with Claude Haiku 5.5 promised in the coming weeks. (Anthropic newsroom announcement of Claude Sonnet 5.5, September 28, 2026)
US dollars per 1M input tokens
Data: Anthropic API price tableverified Chart: AI Journey
The numbers
Speed gain over Sonnet 5
30%+
Anthropic's claimed output speed increase over Sonnet 5
Terminal-Bench 4.0 score
70.6%
Sonnet 5.5's score, versus Sonnet 5's 10.3%
Input price per 1M tokens
$2
Unchanged from Sonnet 5
Cache read price per 1M tokens
$0.20
Unchanged from Sonnet 5
Read from Anthropic newsroom announcement of Claude Sonnet 5.5, September 28, 2026
Tracked on this site: Anthropic API price table
What they are saying
Outlets read
Anthropic claims that Sonnet 5.5 is 30 percent faster than its predecessor, and that its rate of token burn is significantly slower.
read
Anthropic on Monday released a new artificial intelligence model called Sonnet 5.5, the company's second launch since CEO Dario Amodei called to slow down the pace of development.
read
Our verdict
TechCrunch leans on Anthropic's own speed and efficiency framing, while CNBC treats the launch mainly as a data point in Dario Amodei's public stance on development pace, so neither outlet independently tests the cost claims Anthropic printed on its own page. Read together, they describe a company narrating restraint on one hand and shipping a materially quicker model on the other, and it is worth watching whether future releases keep holding the line on published rates the way this one did.
What it means for you
Anthropic left the headline API rate unchanged rather than raising it the way the pricing page once threatened for the prior Sonnet generation, so a team's bill now hinges on how many tokens a workflow burns rather than on a new rate card, and that shifts the practical question from what the model costs per call to how many calls a given task now needs.
In more detail
Anthropic introduced Claude Sonnet 5.5 on September 28, 2026, describing it as a clear upgrade over Sonnet 5 that runs more than 30 percent faster and costs up to 30 percent less for most work. The company frames it as a faster, lower-cost complement to Claude Opus 5.5, aimed at well-scoped everyday tasks, bug fixes and polished documents, slides and spreadsheets, with a Haiku 5.5 model still to come. Sonnet 5.5 is not meant to push the capability frontier the way Opus 5.5 does; Anthropic’s own testers still rate Opus 5.5 stronger on complex, open-ended judgment calls.
On coding benchmarks the jump is large. Anthropic reports Sonnet 5.5 scoring 70.6 percent on Terminal-Bench 4.0, a command-line agentic coding test, against 10.3 percent for Sonnet 5, and within two points of Opus 5.5 on GDPval-AA, a benchmark spanning dozens of occupations. Several partner quotes cited by Anthropic, including from Slack, Zendesk and Box, describe fewer output tokens and faster ticket resolution when swapping in the new model without changing prompts.
The pricing page keeps Sonnet 5.5 at the same per-token rate as Sonnet 5: $2 per million input tokens, $10 per million output tokens and $0.20 per million tokens for cache reads, alongside a $2.50 five-minute cache write rate. Anthropic’s argument is that the model simply needs fewer tokens to finish comparable work, so the effective cost per finished task falls even though the sticker rate does not move. That mirrors a pattern this site’s own price table has already recorded for the Sonnet line, where a scheduled rate increase for the prior standard price did not go ahead.
On safety, Anthropic says Sonnet 5.5 is the first Sonnet model to launch with cyber safeguards and fallbacks resembling those built for its most capable models, because its cybersecurity capability has grown close to Opus 5’s. Its biology safeguards stay unchanged from Sonnet 5, and the company says routine software development and most life sciences work are unaffected by either set of restrictions.
The numbers
- 30%+ faster output generation than Sonnet 5, Anthropic’s fastest Sonnet model to date.
- 70.6% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, versus 10.3% for Sonnet 5.
- $2 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million cache-read tokens, both unchanged from Sonnet 5’s published rate.
For a team already budgeting around Sonnet’s published price, the practical decision this launch creates is whether to keep prompts and workflows as they are and simply bank the token savings, or to redesign agentic pipelines around a model that Anthropic says batches tool calls more efficiently and needs fewer steps to reach the same result.
Sources
Sources read
Anthropic newsroom announcement of Claude Sonnet 5.5, September 28, 2026 (anthropic.com)
Newsroom read
our Anthropic API price table, which shows Sonnet 5's standard rate held instead of rising (aijourney.space)
Own ledger read
Cite this
AI Journey, "Anthropic Launches Claude Sonnet 5.5 With Same Token Prices", 29 Sep 2026, https://aijourney.space/updates/2026-09-29-introducing-claude-sonnet-5-5-announcements-sep-28-2026-a-clear-upgrade-/ (source: Anthropic, verified 29 Sep 2026)
Next in the stream
Google Showcases Four Developer Builds Made With Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google published a roundup of four developer projects built with Gemini 3.8 Flash, the workhorse model it priced into the API this month.
Previous
Study Finds Coding Agents Waste Up to a Quarter of Task Cost on Repeated Work
A new paper analyzing Claude Code and Mini-SWE-Agent trajectories on SWE-bench Verified finds three recurring habits that quietly inflate coding agent bills.
Next
More in Anthropic
Study Finds Precedent Labels Sway Claude Haiku Approval Calls
A new paper tests Claude Haiku 5.5 alongside other models on refund and claim decisions, showing that past case labels shift approvals sharply.
Paper Tests Claude Opus 4.8 Agents on Conflicting Code Edits
A new paper benchmarks Claude Code running Claude Opus 4.8 against other coding agents on tasks where two agents edit the same shared codebase at once.
Paper Finds Claude Opus 5.5 Agent Beats Automated CT Labeling Harness
A new paper testing CT scan labeling finds a free-form agent running Claude Opus 5.5 outscored an automated review harness on most of six public datasets.