Event Published Models and productsAnthropic
Anthropic Releases Claude Opus 5.5 With Lower Prices
Anthropic released Claude Opus 5.5 on September 22, 2026, cutting per-token API prices and raising subscription usage limits for Claude users.
What happened
Published here
On September 22, 2026, Anthropic released Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in a new 5.5 family, cutting API input, output and cache read token prices compared with Opus 5, while raising five-hour usage limits on Pro, Max, Team and seat-based Enterprise subscription plans. (Anthropic newsroom introducing Claude Opus 5.5, September 22, 2026)
US dollars per 1M input tokens
Data: Anthropic API price tableverified Chart: AI Journey
The numbers
Cost reduction
40%
Claimed drop in typical workload cost versus Opus 5
Input tokens
$4
Per million tokens, down from $5 for Opus 5
Output tokens
$20
Per million tokens, down from $25 for Opus 5
Cache reads
$0.20
Per million tokens, down from $0.50 for Opus 5
Read from Anthropic newsroom introducing Claude Opus 5.5, September 22, 2026
Tracked on this site: Anthropic API price table
What they are saying
Outlets read
Anthropic's newest model, Opus 5.5, was released on Tuesday, setting a new state-of-the-art in coding and knowledge work performance, according to the company.
read
Anthropic says Opus 5.5 is the "strongest-performing" model on the company's most comprehensive alignment test.
read
The company described the latest release as a more token-efficient version that will cost around 40% less to run than the company's Opus 5.
read
Our verdict
TechCrunch and CNBC both lead with the price cut, while The Verge focuses instead on the alignment claims Anthropic highlighted for regulators and safety researchers. None of the three outlets independently verify Anthropic's own benchmark numbers, so the performance comparison rests entirely on the company's self-reported figures.
What it means for you
For developers running agentic coding workloads, the input price falling to $4 per million tokens and cache reads to $0.20 per million tokens directly cuts the bill for repeated context, which is the line our Anthropic API price table already tracks for Opus 5 at $5 and $0.50. Teams choosing between Opus 5.5 and cheaper Sonnet 5 now face a narrower cost gap than before, changing which workloads justify the top-tier model.
In more detail
Anthropic opened the Claude 5.5 family with Opus 5.5, a model the company says matches Claude Fable 5.1 on most work while costing 40 percent less to run than Opus 5. The release follows the company’s public call for pacing frontier development, and Anthropic says Opus 5.5 was tested before launch by external evaluators including Frontier Design and METR. The company frames the model as both a capability step and a cost step, pairing new benchmark scores with a lower per-token price table.
On price, input tokens fall to $4 per million and output tokens to $20 per million, each a 20 percent cut from Opus 5. Cache reads, which Anthropic says make up most agentic and coding costs, drop to $0.20 per million tokens, a 60 percent cut. Cache writes fall to $5 per million from $6.25. Alongside the price changes, Anthropic is raising five-hour usage limits on Pro, Max, Team and seat-based Enterprise subscription plans, and adding a rate limit reset that subscribers can save and apply when they choose.
On capability, Anthropic reports gains on agentic coding and knowledge work benchmarks, including Terminal-Bench 4.0 and GDPval-AA v2.1, and says Opus 5.5 scored higher on its internal alignment suite than any model it has tested to date. The company is deploying Opus 5.5 with cybersecurity and biology safeguards similar to those on Fable 5.1, and it is expanding its Cyber Verification Program and Life Sciences Verification Program to cover the new model. Preserved thinking, the anti-distillation measure introduced with Fable 5.1, also applies to Opus 5.5 for eligible API accounts.
The numbers
Anthropic’s own pricing table sets Opus 5.5 at $4 input and $20 output per million tokens, against $5 and $25 for Opus 5, with cache reads cut to $0.20 from $0.50. The company’s headline figure is a 40 percent drop in typical workload cost, a claim it attributes to lower per-token pricing combined with fewer tokens used per task rather than price alone.
Fast mode for Opus 5.5, available in Claude Code and the Claude Platform, costs $8 per million input tokens and $40 per million output tokens, roughly double the standard rate for faster responses. Anthropic did not publish separate pricing for the Sonnet 5.5 and Haiku 5.5 models it says will follow in coming weeks, so the near-term comparison for buyers is between Opus 5.5 and the existing Sonnet 5 and Haiku 4.5 lines already listed on the company’s pricing page. Anyone budgeting for a coding agent that leans on cached context will feel the $0.20 cache read rate more than the headline output price, since cache reads carry most of the token volume in long sessions.
Sources
Sources read
Anthropic newsroom introducing Claude Opus 5.5, September 22, 2026 (anthropic.com)
Newsroom read
our Anthropic API price table (aijourney.space)
Own ledger read
Cite this
AI Journey, "Anthropic Releases Claude Opus 5.5 With Lower Prices", 23 Sep 2026, https://aijourney.space/updates/2026-09-23-introducing-claude-opus-5-5-announcements-sep-22-2026-opus-5-5-performs-/ (source: Anthropic, verified 23 Sep 2026)
Next in the stream
Paper Benchmarks Grok's Voice Agent Across Five Languages
A new paper testing voice agents across five languages found Grok leads on task completion but trails rivals on the quality of its generated speech.
Previous
Claude Pricing Page Now Shows Claude Cowork Folded Into Claude
Anthropic's pricing page now shows Claude Cowork merged into the main Claude product, with new figures for Pro, Max and Team seats.
Next
More in Anthropic
Study Finds Precedent Labels Sway Claude Haiku Approval Calls
A new paper tests Claude Haiku 5.5 alongside other models on refund and claim decisions, showing that past case labels shift approvals sharply.
Paper Tests Claude Opus 4.8 Agents on Conflicting Code Edits
A new paper benchmarks Claude Code running Claude Opus 4.8 against other coding agents on tasks where two agents edit the same shared codebase at once.
Paper Finds Claude Opus 5.5 Agent Beats Automated CT Labeling Harness
A new paper testing CT scan labeling finds a free-form agent running Claude Opus 5.5 outscored an automated review harness on most of six public datasets.